Journal of Modern Nursing MedicineJPCNS

Objective To analyze the value of super early rehabilitation nursing intervention in senile ischemic stroke. Methods Randomized to receive elderly ischemic stroke patients from April 2022 to March 2024 (n = 74). The trial group adopted the ultra-early rehabilitation nursing intervention, and the control group did routine care. Compared with sf-36 score. Results Regarding NIHSS score: after the intervention, as low as (8.03±2.16) in the test group and (11.68±3.04) in the control group, the data were lower (P < 0.05). FMA score: After the intervention, the test group reached (84.17±3.16), and only the control group reached (70.35±4.72), and the comparison group had higher data (P < 0.05). Satisfaction: 97.3% in the test group, but only 78.38% in the control group. The comparison found that the data in the test group were higher (P < 0.05). Sf-36 score: After the intervention, the test group reached (86.02±2.54) and only the control group (78.01±3.59), and the data in the test group were higher (P < 0.05). Conclusion With ultra-early rehabilitation nursing intervention in senile ischemic stroke, patients have better quality of life, higher satisfaction, more obvious improvement of limb function and more rapid recovery of neurological function.

Ischemic stroke; Value; Super early rehabilitation nursing intervention; Quality of life