全程无缝隙护理在手术室护理中的应用研究

Research on the application of seamless nursing throughout the entire process in operating room nursing

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.cn.20240416
刊名
Contemporary Nursing
年,卷(期) 2024, 5(8)
作者
作者单位

重庆市武隆区人民医院 重庆 ;

摘要
在手术室护理流程中应用全程无缝隙护理干预,观察其临床应用效果。方法 为更好地观察护理干预效果,本研究共将研究对象分为两组,其中一组患者在手术室中接受常规护理干预作为对照组,另一组患者在手术室中接受全程无缝隙护理干预作为试验组,研究对象自2023年1月至2024年1月期间抽取,合计抽取110例,对比两组患者手术指标及并发症发生率。结果 全程无缝隙护理干预下,试验组患者术中各项指标均优于对照组,且术后并发症发生率低于对照组患者(P<0.05)。结论 全程无缝隙护理能够有效缓解患者焦虑压抑的心情,及时关注到患者体征变化,对于提高手术成功率及优化各项手术指标有非常重要的意义,利于术后并发症发生概率降低。
Abstract
Objective To apply full seamless nursing intervention in the nursing process of the operating room and observe its clinical application effect. Methods In order to better observe the effectiveness of nursing interventions, the study subjects were divided into two groups. One group of patients received routine nursing interventions in the operating room as the control group, while the other group received full seamless nursing interventions in the operating room as the experimental group. The study subjects were selected from January 2023 to January 2024, with a total of 110 cases selected. The surgical indicators and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups of patients. Results Under the full seamless nursing intervention, all intraoperative indicators of the experimental group patients were better than those of the control group, and the incidence of postoperative complications was lower than that of the control group patients (P<0.05). Conclusion Full course seamless nursing can effectively alleviate the anxiety and depression of patients, timely pay attention to changes in patient signs, and is of great significance in improving the success rate of surgery and optimizing various surgical indicators, which is conducive to reducing the probability of postoperative complications.
关键词
全程无缝隙护理;手术室护理;应用研究
KeyWord
Full process seamless care; Operating room care; Applied research
基金项目
页码 156-158
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

禹霞*. 全程无缝隙护理在手术室护理中的应用研究 [J]. 当代护理. 2024; 5; (8). 156 - 158.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构