International Journal of Clinical Research

Objective To facilitate the diagnosis of viral hepatitis patients and provide accurate diagnostic basis for clinical doctors, further explore the application effect of blood routine and biochemical test items. Methods Fifty patients with viral hepatitis who visited our hospital from December 2022 to December 2023 were selected as the study subjects and included in the observation group. Fifty healthy individuals who underwent physical examinations during the same period were selected as the control group. Both groups received blood routine and biochemical tests, and their blood routine indicators [neutrophil (NEU), platelet count (PLT), white blood cell (WBC) level, and lymphocyte (LYM) level] were measured Compare the clinical efficacy of biochemical test indicators [alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin (TBIL) levels, albumin (ALB), serum albumin/globulin (A/G)]. Results The levels of NEU, LYM, ALT, and TBIL in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The PLT count, WBC level, ALB, and A/G indicators were lower than those in the control group, with P<0.05, indicating a significant difference in comparison. Conclusion In the diagnosis of viral hepatitis, there are significant differences in the levels of various indicators in blood routine and biochemical tests between the tested individuals and healthy individuals, which is helpful for the clinical diagnosis of viral hepatitis and provides effective reference for clinical doctors. The application effect is significant, and it is recommended to promote its application.

Blood routine; Biochemical testing; Viral; Hepatitis; Diagnostic effectiveness