一期与分期输尿管软镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石的临床对比

Clinical comparison of primary and staged flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of upper urinary calculi

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijcr.20240104
刊名
International Journal of Clinical Research
年,卷(期) 2024, 8(3)
作者
作者单位

内蒙古鄂尔多斯市中医医院 内蒙古鄂尔多斯 ;

摘要
探讨上尿路结石治疗中,实施一期与分期输尿管软镜碎石术的价值。方法 以2022年4月-2023年4月收治上尿路结石患者63例作回顾性分析,均行钬激光碎石术,按输尿管软镜碎石术选择分作观察组(n=30例,予以一期输尿管软镜碎石术)、对照组(n=33例,予以分期输尿管软镜碎石术),比较两组临床疗效、不良事件发生率。结果 观察组与对照组手术时间、住院时间、碎石成功率对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不良事件发生率两组对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 上尿路结石选择一期输尿管软镜碎石术疗效显著,安全性高,可于临床推广应用。
Abstract
Objective To investigate the value of performing primary and staged flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones. Methods After retrospective analysis of 63 patients admitted from April 2022 to April 2023, holmium laser lithotripsy was divided into observation group (n=30 cases, primary ureteroscopic lithotripsy) and control group (n=33 cases, staging ureteroscopic lithotripsy) to compare the two groups with clinical efficacy and incidence of adverse events. Results There was no significant difference in operation time, hospital stay and lithotripsy success between the observation and control groups (P> 0.05); no significant difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion The choice of primary ureteral lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi is effective with high safety and can be applied in clinical practice.
关键词
上尿路结石;一期手术;分期手术;输尿管软镜碎石术
KeyWord
Upper urinary calculi; First-stage surgery; Staging surgery; Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy
基金项目
页码 78-80
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

计景新*. 一期与分期输尿管软镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石的临床对比 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2024; 8; (3). 78 - 80.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构