International Journal of Clinical Research

Objective To explore the awareness and participation of grassroots obstetrics and gynecology medical staff in contraception after induced abortion. Methods In January 2024, a questionnaire survey was conducted among obstetricians and nurses in medical institutions in Rugao City using the "Questionnaire Star" mini program. The survey included three parts: general information, awareness of contraceptive services after induced abortion, and participation status. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 17.0 software. Results A total of 117 survey questionnaires from obstetricians and gynecology doctors and 129 nurses were included in the analysis. Among medical staff, 65.85% understood the requirements and service content of contraceptive services after induced abortion, 86.59% supported timely implementation of contraceptive measures after induced abortion, 82.11% supported the first choice of high-efficiency contraceptive measures for those without family planning, 55.28% supported those with family planning to choose high-efficiency contraceptive measures, 69.11% provided targeted education to service recipients after induced abortion, and 29.67% believed that the educational effect was significant. Univariate analysis and t-test results showed that there was a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) in the cognitive score of contraceptive services after induced abortion due to differences in age, position, work experience, professional title, and marriage. However, there was a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) in the score of contraceptive service participation status after induced abortion due to differences in age, position, and work experience. Using cognitive score and participation score as dependent variables, multiple linear regression analysis showed that the t-test differences of job regression coefficient B were statistically significant (t=-4.540, P<0.05) and (t=-2.319, P<0.05), indicating a linear regression relationship between job differences and cognitive and participation status. The differences between doctors and nurses were statistically significant (P<0.05) in terms of their understanding of post abortion contraception services, support for timely implementation of induced abortion contraception, selection of efficient contraceptive measures, implementation of contraception education, content and effectiveness of education, and handling of individuals with poor education outcomes. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that there is room for improvement in the effectiveness of contraception education after induced abortion. There is a significant difference in the ability and effectiveness of contraception education between doctors and nurses after induced abortion. It is recommended to expand training content, innovate training forms, and improve training effectiveness.

Contraception after induced abortion; Obstetrics and gynecology medical personnel; Cognition; Participation status; The Difference