正畸优先模式与手术优先模式对骨性Ⅲ类患者疗效的差异性研究

Study on the difference of curative effect between orthodontic priority mode and surgical priority modeon skeletal class Ⅲ patients

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.iosr.20230003
刊名
International Oral Science Research
年,卷(期) 2023, 2(1)
作者
作者单位

联勤保障部队第九八八医院 河南郑州 ;

摘要
安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的患病率有较明显的种族差异。欧美国家患病率为0.8%~2.0%,亚洲国家为4%~20%。我国安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的总患病率为4.76%(95%CI:3.85%~6.54%)。安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形常表现为单纯上颌后缩、单纯下颌前突,或两者兼有。安氏Ⅲ类错牙合的病例多伴有骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形,部分病例可以通过单纯正畸的方式进行掩饰性治疗。而对于严重的骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的成年患者,通常采用正畸-正颌联合治疗,此类患者常已出现较明显的牙齿代偿现象。有学者认为如果Ⅲ类患者具备以下6种情况中的4种(覆盖≤-4.73 mm; Wits≤-11.18 mm; IMPA≤80.8°;Mx/Mn≤65.9%;覆牙合≤-0.18 mm;下颌角≥120.8°),那么患者将被建议手术治疗。传统的正颌手术时机取决于9~18个月术前正畸排齐整平、去代偿的程度,这个过程有助于产生一个可预测的精确结果。
Abstract
There are obvious racial differences in the prevalence of Angle Class Ⅲ malocclusion. The prevalence rate is 0.8% ~ 2.0% in Europe and America, and 4% ~ 20% in Asian countries. The total prevalence of Class Ⅲ malocclusion in China is 4.76% (95% CI: 3.85% ~ 6.54%). Angle class Ⅲ malocclusion often manifests as simple maxillary retraction, simple mandibular protrusion, or both. Most cases of Angles Class Ⅲ malocclusion are accompanied by skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion, and some cases can be treated by simple orthodontics. For adult patients with severe skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion, orthodontics-orthognathic treatment is usually used, and such patients often have obvious tooth compensation. Some scholars believe that if class Ⅲ patients have four of the following six conditions (coverage ≤-4.73 mm; Wits≤-11.18 mm; IMPA≤80.8°; Mx/Mn≤65.9%; Overbite ≤-0.18 mm; Mandibular angle ≥ 120.8), then the patient will be recommended for surgical treatment. The timing of traditional orthognathic surgery depends on the degree of orthodontic alignment and decompensation 9 ~ 18 months before operation, which is helpful to produce a predictable and accurate result.
关键词
正畸优先模式;骨性Ⅲ类患者;差异性
KeyWord
Orthodontic priority mode; Patients with skeletal class Ⅲ; Otherness
基金项目
页码 8-12
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

李永婷*,马江敏. 正畸优先模式与手术优先模式对骨性Ⅲ类患者疗效的差异性研究 [J]. 国际口腔科学研究. 2023; 2; (1). 8 - 12.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构