骨科护理临床路径在治疗踝关节骨折患者中的应用评价-国际医学与数据杂志-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

骨科护理临床路径在治疗踝关节骨折患者中的应用评价

Evaluation of clinical pathways in orthopedic nursing in the treatment of ankle fractures

ES评分 0 浏览量：687 下载量：0

DOI	10.12208/j.ijmd.20230061
刊名	国际医学与数据杂志 International Journal of Medicine and Data
年，卷(期)	2023, 7(3)
作者	杨丽敏*,
作者单位	中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院骨科云南昆明 ;
摘要	对骨科护理临床路径应用在踝关节骨折患者治疗期间的效果进行分析。方法为了促进踝关节骨折患者护理水平的提升，研究就骨科护理临床路径的具体应用效果展开深入的探讨，将本院50例进行踝关节骨折治疗的患者作为研究对象进行分组，并在分组后分别实施不同的护理干预措施，将两组患者护理后得到的不同护理结果进行比对。结果观察组患者的各项护理效果对比结果均优于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论在踝关节骨折患者治疗期间采用骨科护理临床路径可以有效的改善科室内护理质量，提升患者对护理工作的满意度。
Abstract	Objective To analyze the effect of clinical pathway of orthopaedic nursing in the treatment of patients with ankle fracture. Methods In order to promote the improvement of nursing level of patients with ankle fracture, the specific application effect of clinical path of orthopaedic nursing was discussed in depth. 50 cases of patients with ankle fracture treatment in our hospital were grouped as research objects, and different nursing interventions were implemented after grouping, and different nursing results were compared between the two groups of patients after nursing. Results The nursing effect of observation group was better than that of control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The use of orthopedic nursing clinical pathway during the treatment of patients with ankle fracture can effectively improve the quality of nursing in the department and enhance patients satisfaction with nursing work.
关键词	骨科临床护理路径；踝关节骨折；应用评价
KeyWord	orthopedic clinical nursing path; Ankle fracture; Application evaluation
基金项目
页码	30-32

参考文献
相关文献

[1] 李文君,黄伟妍,夏斌.临床护理路径结合预见性护理在妊娠高血压疾病孕产妇护理中的应用
[J].海南医学,2022,33(14):1902-1904.

[2] 孙兰,李长玉,张蕾.基于快速康复理念的临床护理路径对髋关节置换术患者的影响
[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(04):86-89.

[3] 黄淑娟,晏淑云.临床护理路径在前列腺增生手术患者围术期护理中的应用效果研究
[J].基层医学论坛,2021,25(36):5278-5280.

[4] 崔小群,晏清,高小英,梅申聪.临床护理路径联合集束化护理模式对内镜下结肠息肉切除病人的影响
[J].护理研究,2021,35(02):356-358.

[5] 马云霞. 骨科护理临床路径在治疗踝关节骨折患者中的应用
[J]. 中国医药指南, 2016, 14(5):1.

引用本文

杨丽敏*. 骨科护理临床路径在治疗踝关节骨折患者中的应用评价 [J]. 国际医学与数据杂志. 2023; 7; (3). 30 - 32.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构