新生儿预防接种时疼痛预防中皮肤接触护理对于新生儿接种配合度的影响探讨

Influence of skin contact nursing in pain prevention during neonatal vaccination on neonatal vaccination compliance

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijcr.20220179
刊名
International Journal of Clinical Research
年,卷(期) 2022, 6(4)
作者
作者单位

南充市中心医院 四川南充 ;

摘要
分析新生儿科护理中采用皮肤接触护理的临床效果。方法 选取2021年度我院新生儿科收治的80例患儿,按照常规护理方法和皮肤接触护理将其随机分组,作为对照组和观察组的研究对象,每组患儿人数保持一致。利用观察对比的方法,研究新生儿科患儿采用皮肤接触护理和常规护理方法之间的效果差异。结果 两组的服务态度评分、沟通能力评分、护理技术评分、健康宣教评分和新生儿接种配合评分差异明显,存在统计学意义(P<0.05)结论 采用皮肤接触护理,可以显著增强新生儿科的整体护理质量,使患儿的护理依从性明显改善,令患儿家属对护理工作的满意度大大提高,促进患儿的早日出院,其临床护理效果明显优于常规护理方法。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of skin contact nursing in neonatal nursing. Methods A total of 80 children admitted to the Neonatology Department of our hospital in 2021 were selected and randomly divided into groups according to routine nursing methods and skin-to-skin contact nursing, as the research objects of the control group and the observation group, with the same number of children in each group. Using an observation-comparison approach, we investigated the difference in outcomes between skin-to-skin care and routine care in neonatal infants. Results There were significant differences in service attitude scores, communication ability scores, nursing skills scores, health education scores and neonatal vaccination cooperation scores between the two groups, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion The use of skin-to-skin nursing can significantly enhance the neonatal department. The overall nursing quality is improved, the nursing compliance of children is significantly improved, the satisfaction of childrens family members with nursing work is greatly improved, and the early discharge of children is promoted. The clinical nursing effect is obviously better than that of conventional nursing methods.
关键词
人性化护理;皮肤接触护理;新生儿科护理;临床效果
KeyWord
Humanized nursing; Skin contact nursing; Neonatal nursing; Clinical effect
基金项目
页码 132-134
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

杜春菊*,邓黎,陈莎. 新生儿预防接种时疼痛预防中皮肤接触护理对于新生儿接种配合度的影响探讨 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2022; 6; (4). 132 - 134.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构