疼痛护理方案对老年女性骨质疏松患者护理效果观察-国际护理学研究-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

疼痛护理方案对老年女性骨质疏松患者护理效果观察

Observation of nursing effect of pain nursing program on elderly female patients with osteoporosis

ES评分 0 浏览量：618 下载量：0

DOI	10.12208/j.ijnr.20230235
刊名	国际护理学研究 International Journal of Nursing Research
年，卷(期)	2023, 5(5)
作者	张绒娇,陈金梅,邹成松*,
作者单位	云南省中医医院骨三科云南昆明 ;
摘要	探讨在老年女性骨质疏松患者护理中采用疼痛护理方案的效用价值。方法此次研究共选取104例老年女性患者进行试验，均为骨质疏松病症，采取盲抽方式进行分组，对照组与观察组各52例患者，前者应用常规护理模式，后者实施疼痛护理方案，对两组临床指标情况进行对比。结果经相关数据表明，观察组患者疼痛评分、生活质量水平、SAS与SDS评分明显低于对照组及护理前（P＜0.05）。结论在对老年女性骨质疏松患者展开护理时给予疼痛护理干预手段不仅能够减轻患者疼痛感，更可改善其负性情绪，对患者生活质量水平的提升有积极促进作用。
Abstract	Objective: To explore the utility value of pain nursing program in the nursing of elderly female osteoporosis patients. Methods: A total of 104 cases of elderly female patients were selected for the trial, all osteoporosis disease, blind pumping way to grouping, control group and observation group 52 patients, the former application of conventional nursing mode, the latter implementation of pain nursing program, the two groups of clinical indicators were compared. Results: The relevant data showed that the pain score, quality of life level, SAS and SDS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group and before nursing (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In the nursing of elderly women with osteoporosis, pain nursing intervention can not only reduce the pain of patients, but also improve their negative emotions, which has a positive promoting effect on the improvement of the quality of life of patients.
关键词	疼痛护理方案；老年女性骨质疏松；护理效果
KeyWord	Pain nursing program; Osteoporosis in older women; Nursing effect
基金项目
页码	112-114

参考文献
相关文献

[1] 李巧玲,张慧丽,王灿.协同护理健康引导对老年女性骨质疏松症患者应对方式、自我效能及生活质量的影响
[J].中国医药导报,2022,19(22):168-171.

[2] 丁晓梅,王彧,王青.系统化疼痛护理对老年女性骨质疏松腰背痛患者的疼痛干预及效果评价
[J].智慧健康,2021,7(19):148-150.

[3] 赵艳.骨质疏松疼痛护理方案对老年女性骨质疏松性腰背痛患者的影响分析
[J].心理月刊,2020,15(05):26+28.

[4] 高岚,石钢,张丽霞,陈丽平.康复护理干预对老年女性骨质疏松症股骨颈骨折术后髋关节功能的改善
[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(24):4392-4394.

引用本文

张绒娇,陈金梅,邹成松*. 疼痛护理方案对老年女性骨质疏松患者护理效果观察 [J]. 国际护理学研究. 2023; 5; (5). 112 - 114.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构