International Journal of Surgical Research

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of skin regeneration in the treatment of deep ⅱdegree facial burn and compare it with traditional treatment. Methods We recruited 100 patients with deep second-degree facial burns, 50 of whom received skin regeneration therapy (treatment group) and 50 of whom received traditional treatment (control group). The basic information, wound healing time, wound infection rate, wound scar score and functional recovery were compared between the two groups. Results The basic information of gender, age, burn area and burn cause were similar between the treatment group and the control group. However, the treatment group showed a shorter wound healing time (18.3 days vs. 24.6 days), a lower incidence of wound infection (8% vs. 24%), a lower wound scar score (3.2 vs. 5.7), and better functional recovery, including facial expression, oral function, chewing and swallowing, and visual function. These results indicate that the skin regeneration technique has a significant clinical effect on deep second-degree burns on the face. Conclusion The results of this study indicate that skin regeneration technology has obvious advantages in the treatment of deep second-degree burns on the face. It can accelerate wound healing, reduce wound infection, improve scar conditions, and promote functional recovery. Therefore, skin regeneration medical technology is expected to be an effective treatment option for patients with deep second-degree burns on the face. Further research and clinical practice will help verify the safety and feasibility of this technology and promote its further development and application in clinical applications.

Skin regeneration medical technology; Deep second-degree burns on the face; Wound healing; Incidence of infection; Wound scar; Functional recovery