Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing

Objective To explore the effect of minimally invasive spinal trauma surgery on spinal trauma and the clinical value of different nursing interventions. Methods 200 spinal trauma patients admitted between 2020 and 2022 were selected for study. All patients were treated with minimally invasive spinal trauma surgery and randomized into two groups by digital chart. In the control group, 100 patients were given routine care. The observation group, 200 patients underwent rehabilitation care. Comparing: (1) The treatment effect. (2) Complication rate. (3) Pain score. (4) Perioperative quality of life score. Results (1) In the treatment effect, the apparent efficiency of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P <0.05); but the total response rate was compared (P> 0.05). (2) Among the complications, the incidence was lower in the observation group (P <0.05). (3) In pain, the scores of 1 d and 2 d after surgery were lower (P <0.05). (4) In the quality of life, the observation group had higher perioperative scores (P <0.05). Conclusion The treatment of spinal trauma is good, while high quality nursing can further improve the surgical effect and safety, reduce the pain, improve the quality of life and improve the satisfaction.

Spinal trauma; Minimally invasive spinal trauma surgery; Rehabilitation nursing; Treatment effect; Complication rate; Pain; Quality of life; Satisfaction