Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing

Objective To explore the rescue of patients with cardiac arrest and analyze in detail the effectiveness of emergency critical care. Methods From February 2022 to February 2023, 76 patients with cardiac arrest admitted to our hospital were selected as research subjects. They were randomly divided into nursing groups according to their own wishes. The control group (38 patients) received routine emergency care, while the observation group (38 patients) received emergency critical care. A comparative study was conducted on the rescue effect, GCS score before and after nursing, complications, and quality of life indicators of the two groups of patients. Results Compared with the control group, the heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and successful resuscitation time of the two groups of patients in the observation group were significantly better in all indicators (p<0.05); The GCS scores of the two groups of patients were evaluated, and there was no significant difference before nursing (p>0.05). However, after nursing, the GCS scores of the observation group at 4 to 24 hours after resuscitation were significantly better than those of the control group (p<0.05); The incidence of complications in the observation group (convulsions, delayed response, and atrial fibrillation) was 5.26% compared to 23.68% in the control group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05); After nursing, the quality of life (physiological function, social function, physical pain, and general health status) of the two groups of patients was evaluated. The observation group had significantly higher scores than the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion For the rescue of patients with cardiac arrest, the use of emergency critical care has the most ideal effect, which is beneficial for patients to recover as soon as possible and effectively improve their condition. It is worth promoting.

Emergency critical care; Cardiac arrest; Rescue