Innovation for What? Unpacking the Role of Innovation for Weak and Strong Sustainability-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Innovation for What? Unpacking the Role of Innovation for Weak and Strong Sustainability

Innovation for What? Unpacking the Role of Innovation for Weak and Strong Sustainability

ES评分 0 浏览量：899 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/jsr20200007
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2020, 2(1)
作者	Cristina Chaminade*,
作者单位	Department of Economic History and Circle, Lund University, Sweden ;
Abstract	This perspective paper aims to contribute to current discussions about responsible innovation and innovation systems for sustainability. The paper interrogates the purposes of innovation and its role in sustainable development. It reflects on the differences between adopting weak or strong sustainability as the final goal in terms of innovation and innovation systems. At a meta level, it aims to bring clarity to the use of concepts like innovation, technology or responsible innovation in relation to sustainability and sustainable development discussions. The paper concludes suggesting some areas for future research in the realm of innovation for sustainable development.
KeyWord	innovation; innovation systems; system innovation; responsible innovation; strong sustainability; weak sustainability; globalization
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Galaz V, Tallberg J, Boin A, Ituarte-Lima C, Hey E, Olsson P, Westley F. Global Governance Dimensions of Globally Networked Risks: The State of the Art in Social Science Research. Risk Hazard Crisis Public Policy. 2017;8(1):4-27.

2.Steffen W, Persson Å, Deutsch L, Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Richardson K, et al. The Anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. AMBIO. 2011;40(7):739-61.

3.World Meteorological Organization. United In Science: High-level synthesis report of latest climate science information convened by the Science Advisory Group of the UN Climate Action Summit 2019. New York (US): WMO; 2019.

4.United Nations. Transforming our world. The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York (US): United Nations; 2015.

5.Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc. 2010;15(4):20.

6.Roggema R, Vermeend T, Van den Dobbelsteen A. Incremental change, transition or transformation? Optimising change pathways for climate adaptation in spatial planning. Sustainability. 2012;4(10):2525-49.

7.Patterson J, Schulz K, Vervoort J, van der Hel S, Widerberg O, Adler C, et al. Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environ Innov Soc Trans. 2017;24:1-16.

8.Chaminade C, Lundvall B-A, Haneef S. Advanced Introduction to National Innovation Systems. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar; 2018.

9.Fagerberg J. Mission (im) possible? The role of innovation (and innovation policy) in supporting structural change & sustainability transitions. Oslo (Norway): Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo; 2018.

10.Hölscher K, Wittmayer JM, Loorbach D. Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference? Environ Innov Soc Trans. 2018;27:1-3.

11.TWI2050—The World in 2050. Transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Laxenburg (Austria): International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA); 2018.

12.Leininger J, Dombrowsky I, Messner D, Breuer A, Ruhe C, Janetschek H, et al. Governing the transformations towards sustainability. In: Transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Laxenburg (Austria): International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA); 2018.

13.Scoones I, Stirling A, Abrol D, Atela J, Charli-Joseph L, Eakin H, et al. Transformations to Sustainability. STEPS Working Paper 104. Sussex (UK): ESRC STEPS Centre; 2018.

14.Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J. Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long term transformative change. London (UK): Routledge; 2010.

15.Blok V, Lemmens P. The emerging concept of responsible innovation. Three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation. In: Koops B-J, Oosterlaken I, Romijn H, Swierstra T, van den Hoven J, editors. Responsible Innovation. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature; 2015. p. 19-35.

16.Schlaile MP, Mueller M, Schramm M, Pyka A. Evolutionary economics, responsible innovation and demand: Making a case for the role of consumers. Philos Manag. 2018;17(1):7-39.

17.Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy. 2013;42(9):1568-80.

18.Schlaile MP, Urmetzer S, Blok V, Andersen AD, Timmermans J, Mueller M, et al. Innovation Systems for Transformations towards Sustainability? Taking the Normative Dimension Seriously. Sustainability. 2017;9(12):2253.

19.Urmetzer S, Pyka A. Innovation Systems for Sustainability. In: Leal Filho W, Azul AM, Brandli L, Özuyar PG, Wall T, editors. Decent Work and Economic Growth—The Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature; 2019.

20.Lindner R, Daimer S, Beckert B, Heyen N, Koehler J, Teufel B, Warnke P, et al. Addressing directionality: Orientation failure and the systems of innovation heuristic. Towards reflexive governance. In: Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis 52. Karlsruhe (Germany): Fraunhofer ISI; 2016.

21.Reiter MA, Barresi PA. Meeting Our Sustainability Challenges. J Sustain Res. 2019;1:e190001. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20190001

22.Owen R, Stilgoe J, Macnaghten P, Gorman M, Fisher E, Guston D. A framework for responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant JR, Heintz M, editors. Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2013. p. 27-50.

23.Johnson B, Lema R, Villumsen G. Research on Innovation and Development in the Anthropocene. Globelics Working Paper Series 2017-01. Globelics—Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building Systems. Aalborg (Denmark): Department of Business and Management, Aalborg University; 2017.

24.OECD. Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. Paris (France): OECD Publishing; 2018.

25.Fagerberg J. Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy. Res Policy. 2018;47(9):1568-76.

26.Lundvall B-A. Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Industrial Development Research Series No. 31. Copenhagen (Denmark): Aalborg University Press; 1985.

27.Kline S, Rosenberg N. An overview of innovation. In: Landau R, Rosenberg N; National Academy of Engineering, editors. The Positive Sum Strategy. Washington, D. C. (US): National Academy of Sciences; 1986. p. 289.

28.Lundvall BÅ, Joseph KJ, Chaminade C, Vang J. Innovation system research and developing countries. In: Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar; 2009. p. 1.

29.Asheim B, Gertler M. The geography of innovation. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R, editors. The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 291-317.

30.Asheim BT, Isaksen A, Trippl M. Advanced Introduction to Regional Innovation Systems. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar; 2019.

31.Binz C, Truffer B. Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Res Policy. 2017;46(7):1284-98.

32.Soete L. Is innovation always good. In: Fagerberg J, Martin B, Andersen ES, editors. Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 134-44.

33.Godin B. Innovation contested: The idea of innovation over the centuries. London (UK): Routledge; 2015.

34.Schot J, Steinmueller E. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Res Policy. 2018;47(9):1554-67.

35.Daimer S, Hufnagl M, Warnke P. Challenge-oriented policy-making and innovation systems theory: reconsidering systemic instruments. In: Koschatzky K, editor. Innovation System Revisited: Experiences from 40 years of Fraunhofer ISI Research. Karlsruhe (Germany): Fraunhofer ISI; 2012. p. 217-34.

36.Loorbach D, Frantzeskaki N, Avelino F. Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Ann Rev Environ Res. 2017;42:599-626.

37.Schlaile MP, Urmetzer S. Transitions to sustainable development. In: Leal Filho W, Azul AM, Brandli L, Özuyar PG, Wall T, editors. Decent Work and Economic Growth—The Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature; 2019.

38.Dodgson M, Hughes A, Foster J, Metcalfe S. Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia. Res Policy. 2011;40(9):1145-56.

39.Woolthuis RK, Lankhuizen M, Gilsing V. A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation. 2005;25:609-19.

40.Chaminade C, Edquist C. Rationales for public policy intervention in the innovation process: A systems of innovation approach. In: Kulhman S, Shapira P, Smits R, editors. The theory and practice of innovation policy: an international handbook. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar; 2010.

41.Avelino F, Wittmayer J, Dumitru A, Longhurst N, Hielscher S, Weaver P, et al. Transitions towards New Economies—A Transformative Social Innovation Perspective. TRANSIT working paper #3. Rotterdam (The Netherlands): TRANSIT; 2015.

42.Haxeltine A, Wittmayer J, Avelino F. Transformative social innovation: a sustainability transitions perspective on social innovation. In: Social Frontiers: The Next Edge of Social Science Research. London (UK): Nesta; 2013.

43.Oosterveer P, Spaargaren G. Green comsumption practices and emerging sustainable food regimes: the role of consumers. In: Spaargaren G, Oosterveer P, Loeber A, editors. Food practices in transition: changing food consumption, retail and production in the age of reflexive modernity. London (UK): Routledge; 2012.

44.Weber KM, Rohracher H. Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive "failures" framework. Res Policy. 2012;41(6):1037-47.

45.Pyka A. Dedicated innovation systems to support the transformation towards sustainability: creating income opportunities and employment in the knowledge-based digital bioeconomy. J Open Innov Technol Market Complex. 2017;3(1):27.

46.Urmetzer S, Schlaile MP, Bogner KB, Mueller M, Pyka A. Exploring the dedicated knowledge base of a transformation towards a sustainable bioeconomy. Sustainability. 2018;10(6):1694.

47.Brundtland G. Our common future. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1987.

48.Hector DC, Christensen CB, Petrie J. Sustainability and sustainable development: Philosophical distinctions and practical implications. Environ Values. 2014;23(1):7-28.

49.Michelsen G, Adomßent M, Martens P, von Hauff M. Sustainable Development–Background and Context. In: Heinrichs H, Martens P, Michelsen G, Wiek A, editors. Sustainability Science. An introduction. Dordrecht (the Netherlands): Springer; 2016. p. 5-29.

50.Huesemann MH. The limits of technological solutions to sustainable development. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2003;5(1):21-34.

51.Costanza R, Daly HE, Natural capital and sustainable development. Conserv Biol. 1992;6(1):37-46.

52.Costanza R. Ecological economics: reintegrating the study of humans and nature. Ecol Appl. 1996;6(4):978-90.

53.Røpke I. The early history of modern ecological economics. Ecol Econ. 2004;50(3-4):293-314.

54.Røpke I. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecol Econ. 2005;55(2):262-90.

55.Folke C, Jansson A, Rockström J, Olsson P, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS 3rd, et al. Reconnecting to the biosphere. AMBIO. 2011;40(7):719-38.

56.Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science. 2015;347(6223):1259855.

57.Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin E, et al. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc. 2009;14(2):32.

58.Weitz N, Carlsen H, Nilsson M, Skånberg K. Towards systemic and contextual priority setting for implementing the 2030 Agenda. Sustain Sci. 2018;13(2):531-48.

59.Avila-Calero S. Contesting energy transitions: wind power and conflicts in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. J Political Econ. 2017;24(1):992-1012.

60.Leach M, Rockström J, Raskin P, Scoones I, Stirling AC, Smith A, et al. Transforming innovation for sustainability. Ecol Soc. 2012;17(2):11.

61.Edquist C, Johnson B. Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In: Edquist C, editor. Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. London (UK): Pinter; 1997. p. 33.

62.Binz C, Truffer B, Coenen L. Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring—industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Econ Geogr. 2016;92(2):172-200.

63.Chaminade C, De Fuentes C, Harirchi G, Plechero M. The Geography and Structure of Global Innovation Networks: Global Scope and Regional Embeddedness. In: Shearmur R, Carrincazeaux C, Doloreux D, editors. Handbook on the geographies of innovation. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar; 2017. p. 370-81.

64.Eakin H, Rueda X, Mahanti A. Transforming governance in telecoupled food systems. Ecol Soc. 2017;22(4):32.

65.Fuenfschilling L, Binz C. Global socio-technical regimes. Res Policy. 2018;47(4):735-49.

66.Lenschow A, Newig J, Challies E. Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance. Environ Politics. 2016;25(1):136-59.

67.IPCC. Global Warming of 1.5 °C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C Above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Geneva (Switzerland): IPCC; 2018.

68.Schot J, Kanger L. Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality. Res Policy. 2018;47(6):1045-59.

69.Grillitsch M, Sotarauta M. Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Prog Hum Geogr. 2019. doi: 10.1177/0309132519853870

引用本文

Cristina Chaminade*. Innovation for What? Unpacking the Role of Innovation for Weak and Strong Sustainability, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2020; 2; (1). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200007.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构