Techno-Economic Feasibility of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Renewable Energy System for a School in North-West Indonesia-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Techno-Economic Feasibility of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Renewable Energy System for a School in North-West Indonesia

Techno-Economic Feasibility of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Renewable Energy System for a School in North-West Indonesia

ES评分 0 浏览量：728 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/jsr20200015
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2020, 2(2)
作者	Biadelma Illiandi,Abhishek Tiwary*,
作者单位	Fatih Bilingual School, Sultan Malikul Saleh, No. 103, Bandaraya, Lamlagang, Lam Lagang, Banda Raya, Banda Aceh City, Aceh 23122, Indonesia ; School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK ;
Abstract	Background: Schools typically have high diurnal fluctuation in electricity demand, with peak loads during daylight hours, which could be adequately met through harnessing solar renewable resources. This study demonstrates the strength of techno-economic assessment in selection and optimization of a grid-connected hybrid renewable energy system (HRES), utilizing local renewable resources to fulfil the daytime electricity demand for a school in northwest Indonesia.Methods: Three different scenarios are developed for optimizing the HRES configurations, comprising of PV panels, Wind turbine, Battery and Inverter. The following optimization parameters are used—one, technological performance of the HRES, in terms of their energy output to fulfil the energy deficit; two, economic performance of the HRES, in terms of their net present cost (NPC) and payback periods. Results: A clear trade-off is noted between the level of complexity of the three HRES, their renewable electricity generation potentials, NPC and payback periods. Scenario II, comprising of Solar PV and Inverter only, is found to be the most feasible and cost-effective HRES, with the optimized configuration of 245 kW PV capacity and 184 kW inverter having the lowest initial capital cost of US$ 51,686 and a payback time of 4 years to meet the school’s annual electricity load of 114,654 kWh. Its NPC is US$ −138,017 at the 20th year of installation. The negative value in year 20 is achieved through the sale of 40% of the renewable energy back to the grid.Conclusions: Techno-economic assessment can provide useful decision support in designing HRES relying on solar energy to serve predominantly daytime school electricity requirements in tropical countries.
KeyWord	grid-connected; HRES; NPC; payback; school; techno-economic
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Dutu R. Challenges and policies in Indonesia’s energy sector. Energy Policy. 2016;98:513-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.009

2.KESDM. Strategic Planning 2015-19: National Energy Consumption at Each Sector. Jakarta (Indonesia): KESDM; 2015.

3.REN21. Renewables 2019 Global Status Report. Paris (France): REN21; 2019. Available from: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/28496/REN2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://www.ren21.net/cities/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/REC-GSR-Low-Res.pdf. Accessed 2019 Dec 29.

4.Erdiwansyah, Mamat R, Sani MSM, Sudhakar K. Renewable energy in Southeast Asia: Policies and recommendations. Sci Total Environ. 2019;670:1095-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.273

5.Ismail MS, Moghavvemi M, Mahlia TMI, Muttaqi KM, Moghavvemi S. Effective utilization of excess energy in standalone hybrid renewable energy systems for improving comfort ability and reducing cost of energy: A review and analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;42:726-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.051

6.Kjellstrom T, Briggs D, Freyberg C, Lemke B, Otto M, Hyatt O. Heat, Human Performance, and Occupational Health: A Key Issue for the Assessment of Global Climate Change Impacts. Ann Rev Public Health. 2016;37:97-112. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021740

7.PT PLN (Persero). Statistik PLN 2017. Jakarta (Indonesia): PT PLN (Persero); 2018.

8.EBTKE. Strategic Plan of 2015–2019. Jakarta (Indonesia): EBTKL; 2015.

9.NEC. Indonesia Energy Outlook. Jakarta (Indonesia): NEC; 2016.

10.ESDM P. Perkembangan Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Migas Batubara Energi Baru Terbarukan dan Listrik. Jakarta (Indonesia): ESDM P; 2015.

11.Gajbhiye P, Suhane P. Optimal Sizing of Stand-Alone Hybrid Solar/Wind/Battery/Diesel Energy System. Int J Innovative Res Dev. 2015;4(4):93-8.

12.Kim J, Kim EJ. Simplified method of optimal sizing of a renewable energy hybrid system for schools. Sustainability. 2016;8:1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111134

13.Bilir L, Yildirim N. Photovoltaic system assessment for a school building. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42:17856-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.122

14.Lamnadi M, Trihi M, Boulezhar A. Study of a hybrid renewable energy system for a rural school in Tagzirt, Morocco. In: 2016 International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC); 2016 Nov 14–17; Marrakech, Morocco. Piscataway (NJ, US): IEEE; 2017. p. 381-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IRSEC.2016.7984079

15.Emmanuel M, Akinyele D, Rayudu R. Techno-economic analysis of a 10 kWp utility interactive photovoltaic system at Maungaraki school, Wellington, New Zealand. Energy. 2017;120:573-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.107

16.Economou A. Photovoltaic systems in school units of Greece and their consequences. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15:881-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.028

17.Kaabeche A, Ibtiouen R. Techno-economic optimization of hybrid photovoltaic/wind/diesel/battery generation in a stand-alone power system. Sol Energy. 2014;103:171-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.02.017

18.Hiendro A, Kurnianto R, Rajagukguk M, Simanjuntak YM, Junaidi. Techno-economic analysis of photovoltaic/wind hybrid system for onshore/remote area in Indonesia. Energy. 2013;59:652-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.005

19.Shaahid SM, Elhadidy MA. Technical and economic assessment of grid-independent hybrid photovoltaic-diesel-battery power systems for commercial loads in desert environments. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2007;11:1794-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.001

20.Kolhe ML, Ranaweera KMIU, Gunawardana AGBS. Techno-economic sizing of off-grid hybrid renewable energy system for rural electrification in Sri Lanka. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments. 2015;11:53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2015.03.008

21.Herrando M, Pantaleo AM, Wang K, Markides CN. Solar combined cooling, heating and power systems based on hybrid PVT, PV or solar-thermal collectors for building applications. Renew Energy. 2019;143:637-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.004

22.Shezan SA, Julai S, Kibria MA, Ullah KR, Saidur R, Chong WT, et al. Performance analysis of an off-grid wind-PV (photovoltaic)-diesel-battery hybrid energy system feasible for remote areas. J Clean Prod. 2016;125:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.014

23.Mudasser M, Yiridoe EK, Corscadden K. Cost-benefit analysis of grid-connected wind-biogas hybrid energy production, by turbine capacity and site. Renew Energy. 2015;80:573-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.02.055

24.HOMER. Finding Data to Run HOMER Pro 2017. Available from: https://www.homerenergy.com/products/pro/docs/latest/finding_data_to_run_homer.html. Accessed 2017 Apr 20.

25.Surya Greentek. SOLAR panel - Surya Greentek 250 WP 2017. Available from: https://www.bukalapak.com/p/elektronik/lampu-alat-penerangan/5atypk-jual-solar-panel-panel-surya-greentek-250wp. Accessed 2017 Jun 10.

26.Sustainable Energy Systems Ltd. 5kW Britwind (Formerly Evance) R9000 Wind turbine 2017. Available from: https://www.sustainableenergysystems.co.uk/case-studies/2-x-britwind-r9000-5kw-installation/. Accessed 2017 Jun 15.

27.IMars. iMars M Series solar inverter 2017. Available from: http://www.invt-solar.com/uploadfiles/2019/02/INVT_MG 0.75-6KW user manual.pdf. Accessed 2017 May 10.

28.Varla Aki. VRLA Aki Kering Solar Cell 2017. Available from: https://www.bukalapak.com/p/elektronik/baterai-681/8ov4az-jual-battery-vrla-aki-kering-solar-cell-12v-120ah. Accessed 2017 May 20.

29.HOMER. Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy Resources (HOMER®) Pro Version 3.9 Program 2017. Boulder (CO, US): HOMER; 2017.

30.Ramli MAM, Hiendro A, Sedraoui K, Twaha S. Optimal sizing of grid-connected photovoltaic energy system in Saudi Arabia. Renew Energy. 2015;75:489-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.028

31.Kolhe M, Ranaweera KMIU, Gunawardana AGBS. Techno-economic optimum sizing of hybrid renewable energy system. In: IECON 2013—39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society; 2013 Nov 10–13; Vienna, Austria. Piscataway (NJ, US): IEEE; 2014. p. 1898-903. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2013.6699421

32.Bahramara S, Moghaddam MP, Haghifam MR. Optimal planning of hybrid renewable energy systems using HOMER: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;62:609-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.039

引用本文

Biadelma Illiandi,Abhishek Tiwary*. Techno-Economic Feasibility of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Renewable Energy System for a School in North-West Indonesia, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2020; 2; (2). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200015.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构