Business Sustainability and Insolvency Proceedings—The EU Perspective

Business Sustainability and Insolvency Proceedings—The EU Perspective

ES评分 0

DOI 10.20900/jsr20200019
刊名
JSR
年,卷(期) 2020, 2(2)
作者
作者单位

Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki, Yliopistonkatu 3, 00100 Helsinki, Finland ;

Abstract
Business sustainability refers to economic sustainability performance that promotes profitability and to non-financial sustainability that may or may not create profitability. This paper concentrates on the relation between business sustainability and insolvency proceedings by asking what role business sustainability plays when choosing between restructuring (rescue) and liquidation proceedings. This choice is based on two tests: a viability test and a best interest of creditors test, the latter meaning that no dissenting creditor should be worse off in restructuring than in liquidation proceedings. In addition, the paper asks what role business sustainability plays when making the choice between restructuring and liquidation and what the consequences of this choice are for business sustainability elements. In addition, the paper asks who the stakeholders for business sustainability are in insolvency situations. The finding of the study is that creditor interest should be better balanced with non-financial sustainability, but with the requirement that creditors know the risks beforehand and are able to protect their interests, for example, through securities. Regarding environmental hazards, the paper suggests a “super responsibility” of bankruptcy estates to handle environmental problems, according to the precedent of the Canadian Supreme Court.
KeyWord
business sustainability; economic sustainability performance; non-financial sustainability; insolvency proceedings; restructuring; liquidation; environmental hazard
基金项目
页码 -
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

Tuula Linna*. Business Sustainability and Insolvency Proceedings—The EU Perspective, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2020; 2; (2). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200019.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构