Attitudes and Perceptions of Recreational Boat Owners on Waste Management Processes: A Case Study of Chichester Harbour, United Kingdom-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Attitudes and Perceptions of Recreational Boat Owners on Waste Management Processes: A Case Study of Chichester Harbour, United Kingdom

Attitudes and Perceptions of Recreational Boat Owners on Waste Management Processes: A Case Study of Chichester Harbour, United Kingdom

ES评分 0 浏览量：555 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/jsr20220013
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2022, 4(3)
作者	Paul Oluwatimileyin Olatunji,Jonathan Potts,Pierre Failler*,Richard Austin,
作者单位	School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3HE, UK ; Department of Economics and Finance, Portsmouth Business School, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3DE, UK ; Chichester Harbour Conservancy, the Harbour Office, Itchenor, West Sussex, PO20 7AW, UK ;
Abstract	The paper analyses the current Port Waste Management Plan (PWMP) of Chichester Harbour, United Kingdom. The perceptions and attitudes of recreational boat owners on the waste management process in the Harbour were examined using a web-based survey and a selected semi-structured interview by examining their demographics, vessel choice, and perception of the effectiveness of the PWMP in managing Harbour waste. Our findings revealed that boat owners had little or no awareness of what the PWMP is all about. In addition, they have limited use of the waste reception facilities made accessible by the Harbour despite knowing most of the Harbour’s Environmental Designated Areas (EDAs). Education on the purpose of the PWMP increased publicity and the availability of more affordable pump-out facilities are critical for improving waste management and developing best practices in the Harbour. The research bridged a knowledge gap regarding the perception of the waste management process in Chichester Harbour.
KeyWord	port waste management plan; Chichester Harbour; perception; environmental designated areas; pollution
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1.Marin V, Moreno M, Vassallo P, Vezzulli L, Fabiano M. Development of a multistep indicator-based approach (MIBA) for the assessment of environmental quality of harbours. ICES J Mar Sci. 2008;65(8):1436-41.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

2.Dolgen D, Alpaslan MN, Serifoglu AG. Best waste management programs (BWMPs) for marinas: A case study. J Coast Conserv. 2003;9:57-63.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

3.Chichester Harbour Conservancy. Chichester Harbour Conservancy Management Plan, 2019–2024 (Third Review): An Integrated Coastal Zone Management Strategy for the Trust Port and Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Available from: https://www.conservancy.co.uk/assets/files/cms_item/613/d-Management_Plan_(2019-24)_Third_Review_r-bKLIo0MJzO.pdf. Accessed 2022 Sept 20.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

4.Chichester Harbour Conservancy. Port Waste Management Plan. Available from: https://www.conservancy.co.uk/assets/files/cms_item/448/feature-cUTiaKFfD2.pdf. Accessed 2022 Sept 20.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

5.Maritime & Coastgard Angency. Marine Guidance Note: Guidance on the Merchant Shipping and Fishing Vessels (Port Waste Reception Facilities) Regulations 2003 and amendments. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/608427/MGN_563_rev_1.pdf. Accessed 2022 Sept 20.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

6.Butt N. The impact of cruise ship generated waste on home ports and ports of call: A study of Southampton. Mar Policy. 2007;31(5):591-8.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

7.Ulnikovic VP, Vukic M, Nikolic R. Assessment of vessel-generated waste quantities on the inland waterways of the Republic of Serbia. J Environ Manage. 2012;97:97-101.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

8.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Shipshape shores and waters. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/marinashdbk2003-2_0.pdf. Accessed 2022 Sept 20.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

9.Gómez AG, Valdor PF, Ondiviela B, Díaz JL, Juanes JA. Mapping the environmental risk assessment of marinas on water quality: the Atlas of the Spanish coast. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;139:355-65.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

11.10.Zhang S, Chen J, Wan Z, Yu M, Shu Y, Tan Z, et al. Challenges and countermeasures for international ship waste management: IMO, China, United States, and EU. Ocean Coast Manag. 2021;213:105836PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

11.Goulielmos AM. European policy on port environmental protection. Glob Nest. 2000;2(2):189-97.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

12.Beza PE, Kitsantas TD, Mitselos FA. Ship waste management in the port of Igoumenitsa, Greece. J Phys Sci Appl. 2014;4(6):375-80.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

13.Ball I. Port waste reception facilities in UK ports Iwan Ball. Mar Policy. 1999;23(4–5):307-27.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

14.Di Vaio A, Varriale L, Trujillo L. Management Control Systems in port waste management: Evidence from Italy. Util Policy. 2019;56:127-35.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

15.European Union Commission. Directive 2000/59/EC: Port Reception Facilities for Ship-generated Waste and Cargo Residues, 2000. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02000L0059-20151209&qid=1453737342456&from=EN. Accessed 2022 Sept 20.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

16.Carpenter A, Macgill SM. The EU directive on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues: current availability of facilities in the North Sea. Mar Pollut Bull. 2003;46(1):21-32.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

17.Jaccoud C, Magrini A. Regulation of solid waste management at Brazilian ports: Analysis and proposals for Brazil in light of the European experience. Mar Pollut Bull. 2014;79(1–2):245-53.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

18.Burgin S, Hardiman N. The direct physical, chemical and biotic impacts on Australian coastal waters due to recreational boating. Biodivers Conserv. 2011;20(4):683-701.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

19.Jupp BP, Fowler SW, Dobretsov S, van der Wiele H, Al-Ghafri A. Assessment of heavy metal and petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the Sultanate of Oman with emphasis on harbours, marinas, terminals and ports. Mar Pollut Bull. 2017;121(1–2):260-73.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

20.Sanches VL, Aguiar MR, de Freitas MA, Pacheco EB. Management of cruise ship-generated solid waste: A review. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020;151:110785.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

21.Guerra-Garcia JM, Navarro-Barranco C, Martinez-Laiz G, Moreira J, Giraldez I, Morales E, et al. Assessing environmental pollution levels in marinas. Sci Total Environ. 2021;762:144169.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

22.Ibabe A, Borrell YJ, Knobelspiess S, Dopico E. Perspectives on the marine environment and biodiversity in recreational ports: The marina of Gijon as a case study. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020;160:111645.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

23.Sciortino J, Ravikumar R. Chapter 4—Wastes and Their Management. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/x5624e/x5624e07.htm#4.1%20harbour%20wastes. Accessed 2022 Sept 20.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

24.Saaya Z, Devaraju A, Mustafa N, Leong CC. The implementation of Questionnaires Design Principles via online questionnaire builder. Available from: https://files.core.ac.uk/pdf/13518/235647906.pdf. Accessed 2022 Sept 20.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

25.Parker S, Manson D. Chichester Harbour State of the AONB Report, 2013. Available from: https://www.conservancy.co.uk/assets/files/cms_item/613/d-State_of_the_AONB_(2013)-zvhTkAmwwI.pdf. Accessed 2022 Sept 20.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

26.Brace I. Questionnaire design: How to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research. London (UK): Kogan Page Publishers; 2008.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

27.O’Leary Z. The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project. 3rd ed. London (UK): SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

28.Sennitt A. Establishing the perceptions and attitudes of recreational water users, based in Chichester Harbour, towards environmentally designated areas
[dissertation]. Portsmouth (UK): University of Portsmouth; 2015.
[dissertation]">PubMed/NCBI
[dissertation]&author=Sennitt A">Google Scholar

29.Byrnes T, Buckley R, Howes M, Arthur JM. Environmental management of boating related impacts by commercial fishing, sailing and diving tour boat operators in Australia. J Clean Prod. 2016;111:383-98.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

30.Beer M. Declining English wetland ‘is poor advert for UK’. Available from: https://www.theenergymix.com/2021/03/23/declining-english-wetland-is-poor-advert-for-uk/. Accessed 2022 Jul 28.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

31.Campos CJ, Alves MT, Walker DI. Long term reductions of faecal indicator organisms in Chichester Harbour (England) following sewerage infrastructure improvements in the catchment. Sci Total Environ. 2020;733:139061.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

32.Chichester Harbour Conservancy. Water Quality Information. Available from https://www.conservancy.co.uk/page/water-quality-information#:~:text=Chichester%20Harbour%20is%20classified%20as,filter%20feeding%20on%20the%20seabed. Accessed 2022 Jul 25.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

33.Lau YY, Kawasaki T, Guan J, Not C. An investigation into the attitude and behaviours of ferry passenger towards general waste management. Ocean Coast Manag. 2021;213:105879.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

34.McAuliffe S, Potts J, Canessa R, Baily B. Establishing attitudes and perceptions of recreational boat users based in the River Hamble Estuary, UK, towards Marine Conservation Zones. Mar Policy. 2014;45:98-107.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

35.Slišković M, Ukić Boljat H, Jelaska I, Jelić Mrčelić G. Review of generated waste from cruisers: Dubrovnik, Split, and Zadar Port Case studies. Resources. 2018;7(4):72.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

36.Di Vaio A, López-Ojeda A, Manrique-de-Lara-Peñate C, Trujillo L. The measurement of sustainable behaviour and satisfaction with services in cruise tourism experiences. An empirical analysis. Res Transp Bus Manag. 2021:100619. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100619PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

37.Tangwanichagapong S, Nitivattananon V, Mohanty B, Visvanathan C. Greening of a campus through waste management initiatives: Experience from a higher education institution in Thailand. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2015-0175/full/pdf?title=greening-of-a-campus-through-waste-management-initiatives-experience-from-a-higher-education-institution-in-thailand. Accessed 2022 Sept 20.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

38.DiGiacomo A, Wu DW, Lenkic P, Fraser B, Zhao J, Kingstone A. Convenience improves composting and recycling rates in high-density residential buildings. J Environ Plan Manag. 2018;61(2):309-31.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

39.Kumar KN, Goel S. Characterization of municipal solid waste (MSW) and a proposed management plan for Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2009;53(3):166-74.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

40.Di Vaio A, Hassan R, D’Amore G, Dello Strologo A. Digital Technologies for Sustainable Waste Management On-Board Ships: An Analysis of Best Practices From the Cruise Industry. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2022;1-14. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3197241PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

41.Picuno C, Van Eygen E, Brouwer MT, Kuchta K, Thoden van Velzen EU. Factors shaping the recycling systems for plastic packaging waste—a comparison between Austria, Germany and The Netherlands. Sustainability. 2021;13(12):6772.PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar

引用本文

Paul Oluwatimileyin Olatunji,Jonathan Potts,Pierre Failler*,Richard Austin. Attitudes and Perceptions of Recreational Boat Owners on Waste Management Processes: A Case Study of Chichester Harbour, United Kingdom, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2022; 4; (3). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20220013.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构