Journal of Modern Nursing MedicineJPCNS

Objective To analyze the value of predictive nursing in anesthesia nursing in operating room.Methods Patients admitted to the operating room of our hospital from January 2021 to October 2022 (n=120) wererandomly divided into 60 patients in each of the experimental and control groups. The former received predictivenursing, and the latter received routine nursing. Compare adverse reactions and other indicators. Results Theincidence of complications in the experimental group was 3.33%, which was lower than 21.67% in the controlgroup (P < 0.05). The VAS score of the experimental group (3.37±0.69) was lower than that of the control group(4.25±1.09) (P < 0.05). Heart rate: At the end of the intervention, the experimental group (79.15±5.24) beats /minwas lower than the control group (93.58±5.93) beats /min (P < 0.05). As for satisfaction, the data of theexperimental group was 96.675%, which was higher than that of the control group 80.0% (P < 0.05). About thequality of nursing this index: experimental group data (98.52±0.93） points, control group data (91.58±1.46) pointsConclusion anesthesia nursing in the operating room with predictive nursing, the incidence of adverse reactions islower, postoperative pain is less, heart rate stability is higher, satisfaction is more obvious, the quality of nursingimprovement is more rapid.

Predictive nursing; Adverse reactions; Anesthesia in the operating room; The pain