不同剂量阿芬太尼复合丙泊酚行无痛纤支镜检查效果的比较-国际临床研究杂志-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

不同剂量阿芬太尼复合丙泊酚行无痛纤支镜检查效果的比较

Comparison of painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy with different doses of alfentanil combined with propofol

ES评分 0 浏览量：989 下载量：0

DOI	10.12208/j.ijcr.20220465
刊名	国际临床研究杂志 International Journal of Clinical Research
年，卷(期)	2022, 6(10)
作者	张振,王忠三,陈敏,韩晶晶*,吴茜,
作者单位	湖北航天医院麻醉科湖北孝感 ; 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院麻醉科湖北武汉 ;
摘要	评价不同剂量阿芬太尼和丙泊酚用于无痛线镜检查的麻醉效果。方法选择2020年10月~2021年4月择期行无痛纤支镜检查术的患者66例，ASA Ⅰ或Ⅱ级，入选患者按随机数表法分为3组：A组（静脉推注阿芬太尼1 μg/kg后静脉推注丙泊酚1.5~2mg/kg）、B组（静脉推注阿芬太尼3μg/kg后静脉推注丙泊酚1.5~2mg/kg）和C组（静脉推注阿芬太尼5 μg/kg后静脉推注丙泊酚1.5~2mg/kg）。若患者在气管纤支镜检查时发生睫毛反射或身体运动、呛咳等反应，则需额外补充丙泊酚0.2~0.5mg/kg。对3组病人的丙泊酚总用量进行记录；病人恢复清醒的时间；不良事件的发生，如呛咳，肢体运动，呼吸抑制，循环抑制；持续监测血压、脉搏及氧饱和度，对纤支镜操作总时间和呼吸内科医生手术的满意度进行记录。结果丙泊酚在B组和C组中的总用量、苏醒时间和呛咳发生率均较A组显著降低(P<0.05)，呼吸内科医生的满意度较A组显著提高；呼吸抑制在A组和B组中的发生率比C组低(P<0.05)。循环抑制在A组和B组中的发生率比C组低(P<0.05)，呼吸抑制和循环波动在B组中的发生率比C组低(P<0.05)。结论阿芬太尼3 μg/kg复合丙泊酚1.5~2mg/kg诱导量较适合无痛纤支镜检查所需麻醉深度，适合门诊无痛纤支镜检查。
Abstract	Objective To evaluate the anesthetic effect of different doses of alfentanil combined with propofol in painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Methods Sixty-six patients with ASA I-II undergoing elective fiberoptic bronchoscopy were randomly divided into groups A, B and C group. Alfentanil 1μg/kg(group A), 3μg/kg(group B) and 5μg/kg(group C) were given first, followed by propofol 1. 5 ~ 2mg/kg. The modified conscious sedation (MOAA/S) score was 0. During fiberoptic bronchoscopy, if the patient had eyelash reflex, body movement, or cough, propofol 0.2~0.5 mg/kg was administered. The total amount of propofol, recovery time, incidence of cough, body movement, respiratory depression and circulatory depression and other adverse events were recorded. Blood pressure, pulse and blood oxygen saturation were monitored and the operation time of fiberoptic bronchoscopy and doctors satisfaction were also recorded. Results The total dosage of propofol, recovery time and incidence of cough in groups B and C were significantly lower than those in group A (P＜0.05), and the satisfaction of doctors was significantly higher than that of group A (P＜0.05); The incidence of respiratory depression in group A and B was lower than that in group C (P＜0.05). The incidence of circulatory depression in group A and B was lower than that in group C (P＜0.05). Compared with group C, group B had lower respiratory depression and circulation fluctuation (P＜0.05). Conclusion Alfentanil 3μg/kg, combined with propofol 1.5 ~ 2mg/kg of induction is more suitable for painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy required depth of anesthesia, suitable for outpatient fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
关键词	阿芬太尼；丙泊酚；纤支镜
KeyWord	Alfentanil; Propofol; Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
基金项目
页码	14-17

参考文献
相关文献

[1] Hao, L., et al., Clinical observation of the combined use of propofol and etomidate in painless gastroscopy. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020. 99(45): p. e23061.

[2] Committee, A.S.o.P., et al., Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc, 2018, 87(2): 327-337.

[3] Ho, W.M., et al., Comparison between the recovery time of alfentanil and fentanyl in balanced propofol sedation for gastrointestinal and colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study. BMC Gastroenterol, 2012, 12: 164.

[4] Sridharan, K. and G. Sivaramakrishnan, Comparison of Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Sufentanil and Alfentanil in Combination with Propofol for General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Curr Clin Pharmacol, 2019, 14(2):116-124.

[5] Scholz, J., M. Steinfath, and M. Schulz, Clinical pharmacokinetics of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil. An update. Clin Pharmacokinet, 1996. 31(4): p. 275-92.

[6] Moman, R.N., M.L. Mowery, and B. Kelley, Alfentanil, in StatPearls. 2021, Treasure Island .

[7] Alfentanil, in Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed). 2006: Bethesda (MD).

[8] Eberl, S., et al., The effectiveness of a low-dose esketamine versus an alfentanil adjunct to propofol sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancrea tography: A randomised controlled multicentre trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2020, 37(5): 394-401.

[9] Schick, A., et al., Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Procedural Amnesia and Respiratory Depression Between Moderate and Deep Sedation With Propofol in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med, 2019, 26(4): 364-374.

[10] Barker, M., et al., Sedation with alfentanil versus fentanyl in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: outcomes from a single-centre retrospective study. Perfusion, 2020, 35(2): 104-109.

引用本文

张振,王忠三,陈敏,韩晶晶*,吴茜. 不同剂量阿芬太尼复合丙泊酚行无痛纤支镜检查效果的比较 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2022; 6; (10). 14 - 17.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构