International Journal of Medicine and Data

Objective To analyze the value of posterior minimally invasive spinal surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Methods Patients with lumbar disc herniation (n=82) from October 2020 to July 2022 were randomized, with 41 patients each in the control group. The former underwent minimally invasive posterior spinal surgery and the latter underwent open surgery. Compare the JOA score and other indicators. Results The data for the length of hospital stay and postoperative ambulation time were shorter than those for the control group (P <0.05). For VAS score, 1d: test group data (3.25 ± 0.36) was lower than control data (4.24 ± 0.39) (P <0.05). Regarding the JOA and sf-36 scores, at the end of the treatment: the trial group data was higher than the control group (P <0.05). Regarding the complications, the incidence rate in the trial group was 2.44%, and it was much lower than in the control group with the data of 17.07% (P <0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive spinal surgery for lumbar disc herniation has a better prognosis, lower complication rate, faster recovery, better lumbar function improvement, and faster reduction of postoperative pain.

lumbar disc herniation; quality of life; minimally invasive posterior spinal surgery; pain