后疫情时代广东省地方政府公共服务效率研究探索-科学发展研究-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

后疫情时代广东省地方政府公共服务效率研究探索

Research and exploration on the public service efficiency of local governments in Guangdong Province in the post-epidemic era

ES评分 0 浏览量：732 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.12208/j.sdr.20220207
刊名	科学发展研究 Scientific Development Research
年，卷(期)	2022, 2(6)
作者	林戴嘉*,胡珊珊,
作者单位	广东创新科技职业学院 ; 岭南师范学院 ;
摘要	本文的研究目的在于揭示出2020年新冠疫情期间，广东21个城市公共服务支出效率现状以及造成效率不平衡的主要原因，从而提出提升效率改进的方式。应用熵权法，对11个投入产出指标进行同质性赋权合并，将指标组合成为7个；并将组合后的7个指标，以广东省21个城市作为DUM，通过DEA超效率方法，分析出不同城市效率的差异性以及影响效率的因素。结果显示，广东省的公共服务支出效率整体处于高水平，效率区域差异性也比较小，但是大部分城市的规模报酬呈现递减，存在资源浪费。在超效率值中，深圳茂名效率最高，广州最低，并且严重出现规模报酬递减。通过实证分析得出结论，广东省的公共服务支出效率整体呈现出高效率且区域平稳的状态，西部城市茂名市有崛起的趋势，东部城市有供给不足的现象，省会广州市也出现规模报酬递减等问题。为此本文提出三种优化资源配置的方案：第一，继续深度加强电子政府的建设，借助区块链技术，及时监控政府开支，减少公共服务支出浪费；第二，实现地方政府公共服务集群化，减少同一个区域的重复建设；第三，加强与区域地方政府的交流沟通工作，建立兄弟城市间的公共服务效率探讨。
Abstract	The purpose of this paper is to reveal the current situation of public service expenditure efficiency and the main reasons for the imbalance in public service expenditure in 21 cities in Guangdong during the new crown epidemic in 2020, so as to propose ways to improve efficiency. The entropy weight method was applied to homogeneously empower and merge 11 input-output indicators, and the indicators were combined into 7; Taking 21 cities in Guangdong Province as DUM, the 7 combined indicators were used as DUM, and the differences in efficiency of different cities and the factors affecting efficiency were analyzed through the DEA super efficiency method. The results show that the overall efficiency of public service expenditure in Guangdong Province is at a high level, and the regional difference in efficiency is relatively small, but the scale remuneration in most cities is decreasing, and there is waste of resources. Among the ultra-efficiency values, Shenzhen Maoming has the highest efficiency and Guangzhou has the lowest efficiency, and there is a serious decline in scale return. Through empirical analysis, it is concluded that the overall efficiency of public service expenditure in Guangdong Province shows a state of high efficiency and regional stability, with the western city of Maoming City showing a rising trend, the eastern city having a phenomenon of insufficient supply, and the provincial capital Guangzhou City also experiencing problems such as diminishing scale returns. To this end, this paper proposes three solutions to optimize resource allocation: first, continue to strengthen the construction of e-government, use blockchain technology, timely monitor government expenditure, and reduce the waste of public service expenditure; Second, realize the clustering of local government public services and reduce the duplication of construction in the same area; Third, strengthen exchanges and communication with regional local governments, and establish discussions on the efficiency of public services between sister cities.
关键词	公共服务支出效率；熵权法；超效率DEA模型
KeyWord	efficiency of public service spending; entropy weight law; Ultra-efficient DEA model
基金项目
页码	131-137

参考文献
相关文献

[1] Ferlie Pettigrew, Andrew Ashburner, Lynn Fitzgerald, Louise. The New Public Management in Action Ewan［J］. LongRange Planning，1997（1）：145.nbsp;
[2] 杜万松. 公共产品公共服务:关系与差异［J］.中共中央党校学报，2011（12）:63-66.nbsp;
[3] 张文礼，吴光芸. 论服务型政府与公共服务的有效供给
[J]. 兰州大学学报（社会科学版），2007（5）:96-102.nbsp;
[4] 李文钊，毛寿龙. 中国政府改革:基本逻辑与发展趋势［J］.管理世界，2010（8）:44-58.nbsp;
[5] 《中共中央政治局常务委员会召开会议研究加强新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎疫情防控工作》，《人民日报》2020 年 2 月 4 日（1）。nbsp;
[6] 习近平：《切实把思想统一到党的十八届三中全会精神上来》，《人民日报》2014 年 1 月 1 日（2）。nbsp;
[7] 何平平，唐任伍，马骥. 我国省级政府效率综合评价指标体系设计与评估［J］.湖南大学学报，2007（9）:68-71.nbsp;
[8] 董建新，余钧. 中国行政成本的演变特征及其驱动因素分析（2000-2009）［J］. 中国行政管理，2012（6）:112-117.nbsp;
[9] Loutas Nikolaos，Peristeras Vassilios，Tarabanis Konstantinos. The Public Service ontology：A formal model for describing domain-specific semantics［J］. International Journal of Metadata，Semantics and Ontologies，2011（9）:23-34.nbsp;
[10] 唐任伍，唐天伟. 2002年我国省级地方政府效率测度［J］.中国行政管理，2004（6）:64-68.nbsp;
[11] 李超显，曾润喜，徐晓林. DEA在政府社会管理职能绩效评估中的应用［J］.情报杂志，2012（8）:204-208.nbsp;
[12] 唐天伟，邓久根. 测度政府效率的理论依据与实践［J］.经济管理，2007（10）:92-96.nbsp;
[13] Chong Un Pyon，Min Jung Lee，Sang Chan Park. Decisionsupport system for service quality management usingcustomer knowledge in public service organization［J］. ExpertSystems with Applications，2009，36：8227-8238.
[14] 刘武，朱晓楠. 地方政府行政服务大厅顾客满意度指数模型的实证研究［J］.中国行政管理，2006（12）:32-35.nbsp;
[15] 何华兵. 基本公共服务均等化满意度测评体系的构建和应用［J］.中国行政管理，2012（11）:25-29.nbsp;
[16] Janssen Marian，Joha Anton. Understanding IT governancefor the operation of shared services in public service networks［J］. International Journal of Networking and VirtualOrganisations，2007（4）:20-34.nbsp;
[17] Lynn Crawford，Kerry Costello，Julien Pollack，LesleyBentley. Managing soft change projects in the public sector［J］. International Journal of Project Management，2003 : 443–448.nbsp;
[18] Matheus Ricardo，Ribeiro Manuella M，Vaz José Carlos，DeSouza Cesar A. Case studies of digital participatory budget⁃ing in Latin America - Models for citizen engagement［C］//4th International Conference on Theory and Practice ofElectronic Governance. Beijing：ACM International Confer-ence Proceeding Series，2010: 31-36.nbsp;
[19] Efremov Roman，Insua David Ríos. An experimental studyof a web-based framework for group decision support withapplications to participatory budget elaboration［J］.International Journal of Technology，Policy and Management，2007（7）: 167-177.nbsp;
[20] Cáceres Paloma，Ríos Jesús，De Castro Valeria，Insua David Ríos，Marcos Esperanza. Improving usability in edemocracy systems: Systematic development of navigation inan eparticipatory budget system［J］. International Journalof Technology，Policy and Management，2007（7）：151-166.nbsp;
[21] 续竞秦，杨永恒. 地方政府基本公共服务供给效率及其影响因素实证分析——基于修正的 DEA两步法［J］.财贸研究，2011（6）：89-96.

引用本文

林戴嘉*,胡珊珊. 后疫情时代广东省地方政府公共服务效率研究探索 [J]. 科学发展研究. 2022; 2; (6). 131 - 137.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构