上海地区主要市售品种猪肉品质的分析与评定-食品安全质量检测学报-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

上海地区主要市售品种猪肉品质的分析与评定

Analysis and evaluation of pork quality in major market varieties from Shanghai Region

ES评分 0 浏览量：241 下载量：0

DOI	10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250207002
刊名	食品安全质量检测学报 Journal of Food Safety and Quality
年，卷(期)	2025, 16(9)
作者	邓波, 陈柔含, 杨晓君, 周雨璊, 马颖清, 沈秀平*,
作者单位	上海市农产品质量安全中心
摘要	目的构建上海地区主售猪肉品质评价体系, 分析不同品种猪肉的外观、质构、营养和风味指标。方法采集浦东白猪等7个公猪品种共95份背最长肌, 检测55项参数, 运用相关性分析及雷达图谱等方法确定品质评价核心指标。结果外观品质上, 不同猪种在pH、水分等指标有差异, 沙乌头猪、浦东白猪和上海白猪的含水量略低, 沙乌头猪的滴水损失率较高, 托佩克猪肌内脂肪含量略高, 相关性分析显示水分含量与24 h滴水损失等呈负相关。质构方面, 枫泾猪剪切力较高, 托佩克猪硬度显著高于其他品种, 相关性分析显示剪切力与硬度负相关、与弹性正相关。营养品质方面, 上海地方品种猪肉蛋白质含量高于杜长大猪种参考值, 三元猪和上海白猪脂肪略低, 三元猪的必需氨基酸占比最低。风味品质上, 各猪种鲜味氨基酸总量相近, 上海白猪胞苷酸含量高, 三元猪和枫泾猪尿苷酸高, 托佩克猪多种呈味核苷酸低, 沙乌头猪腺苷酸高, 相关性分析得出天冬氨酸与鲜味氨基酸总量等呈正相关。结论可围绕水分含量、导电率、剪切力、硬度、回弹性、蛋白质、脂肪、镁、钾、硒含量、腺苷酸、肌苷酸和天冬氨酸这13项核心指标构建上海猪肉品质评价体系。未来需全面考量相关因素, 构建综合评价模型。
Abstract	Objective To construct a quality evaluation system for the main-sold pork in Shanghai and analyze the appearance, texture, nutrition, and flavor indicators of different pig breeds. Methods A total of 95 samples of the longissimus dorsi muscles were collected from 7 boar breeds, including Pudong White pigs. Fifty-five parameters were detected. Correlation analysis and radar charts were used to determine the core indicators for quality evaluation. Results In terms of appearance quality, different pig breeds showed differences in indicators such as pH and moisture content. Shawutou pigs, Pudong White pigs and Shanghai White pigs had slightly lower water content, while Shawutou pigs had a high drip loss rate. Topigs had slightly higher intramuscular fat content. Correlation analysis showed that the water content was negatively correlated with 24-hour drip loss. Regarding texture, Fengjing pigs had high shear force, Topigs had high hardness. Correlation analysis showed that the shear force was negatively correlated with hardness and positively correlated with elasticity. In terms of nutritional quality, it showed that the protein content in Shanghai local pig breeds was higher than that in common Duroc-Landrace-Yorkshire pigs. Three-way crossbred pigs and Shanghai White pigs had slightly lower fat content. The proportion of essential amino acids was the lowest in three-way crossbred pigs. In terms of flavor quality, the total amount of umami amino acids in each pig breed was similar. Shanghai White pigs had a high content of cytidine monophosphate, three-way crossbred pigs and Fengjing pigs had a high content of uridine monophosphate, Topigs had a low content of multiple flavor-related nucleotides, and Shawutou pigs had a high content of adenosine monophosphate. Correlation analysis showed that aspartic acid was positively correlated with the total amount of umami amino acids. Conclusion A quality evaluation system for Shanghai pork can be constructed around 13 core indicators, including water content, conductivity, shear force, hardness, resilience, protein, fat, magnesium, potassium, selenium content, adenosine monophosphate, inosine monophosphate, and aspartic acid. In the future, relevant factors need to be comprehensively considered to construct a comprehensive evaluation model.
关键词	猪肉品质评价体系；背最长肌；核心指标；相关性分析
KeyWord	pork quality; evaluation system; longissimus dorsi muscle; core indicators; correlation analysis
基金项目
页码	248-258

参考文献
相关文献

[1]贾金玉. 优质猪肉品质评价方法研究及基础数据库的建立
[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2022. JIA JY. Research on quality evaluation method of high quality pork and establishment of basic database
[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2022.
[2]MILLER R. 3-Factors affecting the quality of raw meat
[J]. Agriculture Food Science, 2002: 27–63. DOI: 10.1533/9781855736665.1.27
[3]王言, 钟志君, 何志平, 等. 四川6个地方猪种的育肥和胴体性能以及肉质和风味物质比较研究
[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2021, 53(1): 7–12. WANG Y, ZHONG ZJ, HE ZP, et al. Comparative study on fattening and carcass performance, meat quality and flavor substances of six local pig breeds in Sichuan
[J]. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2021, 53(1): 7–12.
[4]魏宗友, 张阳阳, 任慧鹏, 等. 梅山猪及其与巴克夏杂交猪肌肉氨基酸和脂肪酸含量的比较研究
[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2020, 52(10): 17–20. WEI ZY, ZHANG YY, REN HP, et al. Comparative study on the content of amino acids and fatty acids in muscle of Meishan pigs and their hybrid pigs with Berkshire
[J]. Livestock and Veterinary, 2020, 52(10): 17–20.
[5]刘汇鑫, 薛超, 董立才, 等. 江泉黑猪、江泉白猪和杜长大猪的胴体性能及肉品质分析
[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2024, 60(8): 275–278. LIU HX, XUE C, DONG LC, et al. Analysis of carcass performance and meat quality of Jiangquan black pig, Jiangquan white pig and Duchangda pig
[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry, 2024, 60(8): 275–278.
[6]陆雪林, 吴昊旻, 薛云, 等. 上海4个地方猪种的肥育性能和肉质特性分析
[J]. 养猪, 2020(4): 65–69. LU XL, WU HM, XUE Y, et al. Analysis of fattening performance and meat quality characteristics of four local pig breeds in Shanghai
[J]. Pig Breeding, 2020(4): 65–69.
[7]许栋, 陆雪林, 沈富林, 等. 浦东白猪育肥阶段生长曲线拟合的研究
[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2017, 49(11): 20–23. XU D, LU XL, SHEN FL, et al. Study on growth curve fitting of fattening stage of Pudong white pig
[J]. Livestock and Veterinarian, 2017, 49(11): 20–23.
[8]BARBUT SJBPS. Problem of pale soft exudative meat in broiler chickens
[J]. British Poultry Science, 1997, 38(4): 355–358.
[9]李娜, 张琪, 刘洪亮, 等. 松辽黑猪与引入猪种肉品质性状的综合对比分析
[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2022, 16: 55–59, 65. LI N, ZHANG Q, LIU HL, et al. Comprehensive comparative analysis of meat quality traits between Songliao black pig and introduced pig breeds
[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 16: 55–59, 65.
[10]ZHANG J, WANG T, YANG C, et al. Integrated proteomics and metabolomics analysis revealed the mechanisms underlying the effect of irradiation on the fat quality of Chinese bacon
[J]. Food Chemistry, 2023, 413: 135385.
[11]ZUBER EA, OUTHOUSE AC, HELM ET, et al. Contribution of early-postmortem proteome and metabolome to ultimate pH and pork quality
[J]. Meat and Muscle Biology, 2021, 5(1): 1–17.
[12]葛倩倩. 猪肉中呈味核苷酸变化规律及肌苷酸基体标准样品研制
[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2020. GE QQ. Variation of flavor nucleotides in pork and development of inosinic acid matrix standard samples
[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2020.
[13]邓波, 马颖清, 陈柔含, 等. 上海地产猪肉品质主要评价指标的筛选及分级标准的建立
[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2025, 16(3): 184–194. DENG B, MA YQ, CHEN RH, et al. Screening of main evaluation indexes and establishment of grading standards for pork quality in Shanghai
[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2025, 16(3): 184–194.
[14]黎琪, 檀馨悦, 王晴, 等. 市售黑猪和白猪营养成分分析及评价
[J]. 肉类研究, 2022, 36(12): 22–27. LI Q, TAN XY, WANG Q, et al. Analysis and evaluation of nutritional components of black and white pigs sold in the market
[J]. Meat Research, 2022, 36(12): 22–27.
[15]左家信, 陈东洋, 王琳, 等. 湖南产地10种畜肉类及其制品氨基酸组成分析及营养评价
[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2025, 16(5): 104–111. ZUO JX, CHEN DY, WANG L, et al. Amino acid composition and nutritional evaluation of 10 kinds of livestock meats and products in Hunan Province
[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2025, 16(5): 104–111.
[16]FRANCO D, VAZQUEZ JA, LORENZO JM. Growth performance, carcass and meat quality of the Celta pig crossbred with Duroc and Landrace genotypes
[J]. Meat Science, 2014, 96(1): 195–202.
[17]CHEN C, ZHU J, REN H, et al. Growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality and chemical composition of the Shaziling pig and its crossbreeds
[J]. Livestock Science, 2021, 244: 104342.
[18]JO?O CR, ADRIANO N, BRUNA C, et al. Evaluation of different percentages of Duroc genes and gender on growth, carcass and meat quality traits for pigs
[J]. Meat Science, 2023, 205: 109314.
[19]HUANG M, ZHANG H, WU ZP, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals genetic structure and introgression in Pudong white pigs
[J]. Animal, 2021, 15(10): 100354.
[20]贾金玉, 张慧芳, 孟宪华, 等. 宝蓄黑猪肉品质评价及关键风味物质分析
[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2020, 22: 50–54. JIA JY, ZHANG HF, MENG XH, et al. Analysis of quality evaluation and key flavor substances of Baoshu black pork
[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2020, 22: 50–54.
[21]MOELLERA SJ, MILLERB KK, EDWARDS RK, et al. Consumer perceptions of pork eating quality as affected by pork quality attributes and end-point cooked temperature
[J]. Meat Science, 2010, 84: 14–22.
[22]CHEN D, WU P, WANG K, et al. Combining computer vision score and conventional meat quality traits to estimate the intramuscular fat content using machine learning in pigs
[J]. Meat Science, 2022, 18: 108727.
[23]LU S, XU Y, SONG X, et al. Multi-omics reveal the effects and regulatory mechanism of dietary neutral detergent fiber supplementation on carcass characteristics, amino acid profiles, and meat quality of finishing pigs
[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 445: 138765.
[24]和军飞, 黄涛, 孙艳洋, 等. 影响杜长大商品猪胴体评级的性状分析
[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2020, 52(5): 1–6. HE JF, HUANG T, SUN YY, et al. Factors influencing classification of DLY pig carcass
[J]. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, 2020, 52(5): 1–6.
[25]陈李, 周存六. 化学干预调控肉及肉制品嫩度的研究进展
[J]. 肉类研究, 2021, 35(3): 53–59. CHEN L, ZHOU CL. Research progress on chemical intervention to regulate meat and meat product tenderness
[J]. Meat Research, 2021, 35(3): 53–59.
[26]黄晶晶, 鄢嫣, 张福生, 等. 安徽品种猪肉低温贮藏期间的品质变化
[J]. 肉类研究, 2020, 34(4): 58–63. HUANG JJ, YAN Y, ZHANG FS, et al. Quality changes of Anhui variety pork during low temperature storage
[J]. Meat Research, 2020, 34(4): 58–63.
[27]李改英, 王冰洁, 李新建, 等. 基于主成分分析的河南省不同地方品种猪肉品质分析
[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2024, 60(5): 177–182. LI GY, WANG BJ, LI XJ, et al. Analysis of pork quality of different local varieties in Henan Province based on principal component analysis
[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry, 2024, 60(5): 177–182.
[28]张开强, 韦荣编, 宋茹, 等. 北太平洋鱿鱼(Todarodes pacificus)内脏自溶液总氨基酸组成质量评价和体外抗氧化性分析
[J]. 食品科学, 2017, 38(1): 238–243. ZHANG KQ, WEI RB, SONG R, et al. Quality evaluation of total amino acid composition and in vitro antioxidant analysis of visceral self-solution of Todarodes pacificus
[J]. Food Science, 2017, 38(1): 238–243.
[29]ZHANG S, HUANG Y, ZHENG C, et al. Leucine improves the growth performance, carcass traits, and lipid nutritional quality of pork in Shaziling pigs
[J]. Meat Science, 2024, 210: 109435.
[30]贾涛. 饲料中的营养物质对动物肉制品的影响
[J]. 饲料与畜牧, 2015(4): 39–41. JIA T. Effect of nutrients in feed on animal meat products
[J]. Feed and Animal Husbandry, 2015(4): 39–41.
[31]刁小琴, 孙薇婷, 徐筱君, 等. 肉制品风味物质分析及其在加工中变化的研究进展
[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2021, 12(8): 2991–2999. DIAO XQ, SUN WT, XU XJ, et al.
[J]. Analysis of flavor substances in meat products and their changes in processing
[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2021, 12(8): 2991–2999.
[32]CHEN X, LIU H, LI C, et al. Revealing the characteristic aroma and boundary compositions of five pig breeds based on HS-SPME/GC-O-MS, aroma recombination and omission experiments
[J]. Food Research International, 2024, 178: 113954.
[33]刘海珍, 黄文颖, 郝云晴. 青海八眉猪肉营养品质分析研究
[J]. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2017, 47(5): 7–11. LIU HZ, HUANG WY, HAO YQ. Analysis of nutritional quality of Qinghai Bamei pork
[J]. Qinghai Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2017, 47(5): 7–11.
[34]黄济, 涂尾龙, 王洪洋, 等. 藏香杂野猪与杜长大三元猪肉质特性比较
[J]. 上海畜牧兽医通讯, 2023(3): 5–8. HUANG J, TU WL, WANG HY, et al. Comparison of pork quality characteristics between Tibetan wild boar and DLY
[J]. Shanghai Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Newsletter, 2023(3): 5–8.
[35]涂尾龙, 蒋玮, 何川, 等. 四个上海地方猪肉品质比较分析
[J]. 上海畜牧兽医通讯, 2024(2): 1–4. TU WL, JIANG W, HE C, et al. Comparative analysis of pork quality in four Shanghai locals
[J]. Shanghai Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Newsletter, 2024(2): 1–4.
[36]王海洲, 王加众, 王春平, 等. 五莲黑猪与杜长大猪的胴体品质及营养成分比较分析
[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2022, 58(2): 65–68, 74. WANG HZ, WANG JZ, WANG CP, et al. Comparative analysis of carcass quality and nutrient composition between Wulian black pig and DLY pig
[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry, 2022, 58(2): 65–68, 74.
[37]葛倩倩, 汤晓艳, 涂婷, 等. 不同品种猪肉鲜味特征比较研究
[J]. 肉类研究, 2020, 34(9): 1–5. GE QQ, TANG XY, TU T, et al. Comparative study on umami characteristics of different varieties of pork
[J]. Meat Research, 2020, 34(9): 1–5.

引用本文

邓波, 陈柔含, 杨晓君, 周雨璊, 马颖清, 沈秀平*. 上海地区主要市售品种猪肉品质的分析与评定 [J]. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2025; 16; (9). 248 - 258.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构