| Abstract |
Objective To investigate and analyse the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for urological stones. Methods: This study was carried out in the Department of Urology, and a total of 72 patients who had been diagnosed with urological stones were selected as research subjects. In order to achieve the purpose of the study, 72 patients were randomly grouped, one group was the control group, using conventional open surgery, and the other group was the observation group, implementing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, with 36 cases in each group, comparing the therapeutic efficacy under different surgical methods. Results: firstly, the clinical indicators of the two groups were statistically compared, including operation time, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, etc., and the above clinical indicators of the observation group were better (P＜0.05); secondly, the postoperative stone extraction rate of the observation group was higher (P＜0.05); finally, there were 2 cases and 9 cases of postoperative complications in the observation group and the control group, with an incidence rate of 5.56% and 25% respectively, and the complication rate of the observation group was significantly lower than the control group. The complication rate was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotripsy can achieve good efficacy in the treatment of urinary stones and can effectively prevent the risk of complications.
|