| Abstract |
Objective: To investigate the effect of minimally invasive internal fixation and open reduction on calcaneal fracture. Methods: From May 2020 to May 2021, 62 patients with calcaneal fracture in our hospital were selected to participate in the study. They were divided into two groups according to the random number table, 31 patients in each group. The control group was treated with open reduction and the observation group was treated with minimally invasive internal fixation. The clinical efficacy, surgical related indicators, VAS score, AOFAS score, SF-36 score, fracture healing time, Bohler angle, Gissane angle and complication rate of the two groups were compared. Results: The effective rate of 96.77% in the observation group was significantly higher than that of 77.42% in the control group (P, VAS score (1.23 ± 0.15) was lower in the observation group, AOFAS score (93.12 ± 5.08) and SF-36 score (84.32 ± 5.12) were higher (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 6.45%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (29.03%). Conclusion: Compared with the effect of open reduction, minimally invasive internal fixation for calcaneal fracture patients has significant effect, less trauma, shorter recovery time, and is conducive to prognosis. However, the best surgical method should be selected according to the actual condition of patients.
|